Japanese prime minister Kishida once said that company’s benefit should return for the employee, not for the shareholders but the shareholders is comapny’s owner, right? I think Kishida is unfair because shareholders taking risks to govern the company so they have the right to receive the benefit. This is the principal of the capitalism. How do you think about the Kishida’s remark?

As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can provide you with some context and information to consider.
Firstly, it is true that shareholders own a portion of a company and, therefore, have a stake in the company’s profits. However, it is important to note that a company’s success is not solely dependent on the interests of shareholders, but also on the well-being and contributions of its employees.
Many companies operate with the belief that their employees are a valuable asset, and their satisfaction and success are important for the long-term success of the company. This is often reflected in policies such as employee benefit programs, training and development opportunities, and employee recognition programs.
Kishida’s statement appears to suggest a shift towards prioritizing employee well-being and benefits over shareholder interests. This approach could be seen as a departure from traditional capitalist principles, which prioritize the interests of shareholders above all else.
However, it is worth noting that there are different schools of thought on the purpose of a company and the role of shareholders. Some argue that companies have a responsibility to consider the interests of all stakeholders, including employees, customers, and the wider community, rather than just the interests of shareholders.
Ultimately, the debate around Kishida’s remark highlights the ongoing discussion around the purpose and values of companies in modern society, and the responsibilities they have towards their stakeholders.